<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Building the Social Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulpedersen.com/blog/2009/07/is-google-building-the-social-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulpedersen.com/blog/2009/07/is-google-building-the-social-web/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=is-google-building-the-social-web</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing Professional (SEO, PPC/CPC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johnnie</title>
		<link>http://paulpedersen.com/blog/2009/07/is-google-building-the-social-web/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulpedersen.com/blog/2009/07/is-google-building-the-social-web/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the problems lies with their inability to produce viable, and profitable revenue from some of their biggest innovative platforms (such as YouTube.com and Blogger.com.  Factor in the history of social networking sites (such as FaceBook.com and MySpace.com) and their excessively slow adaptations of business strategy to generate revenue and you have your answer.  In essence, Google is good at making money from concepts that have been done (paid search), by doing it better.  Throwing in a structure that hasn&#039;t been done in a profitable way yet (YouTube) and suddenly their at a loss.  It just doesn&#039;t make good business sense at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the problems lies with their inability to produce viable, and profitable revenue from some of their biggest innovative platforms (such as YouTube.com and Blogger.com.  Factor in the history of social networking sites (such as FaceBook.com and MySpace.com) and their excessively slow adaptations of business strategy to generate revenue and you have your answer.  In essence, Google is good at making money from concepts that have been done (paid search), by doing it better.  Throwing in a structure that hasn&#8217;t been done in a profitable way yet (YouTube) and suddenly their at a loss.  It just doesn&#8217;t make good business sense at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOKudos</title>
		<link>http://paulpedersen.com/blog/2009/07/is-google-building-the-social-web/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOKudos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulpedersen.com/blog/2009/07/is-google-building-the-social-web/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Google Building the Social Web?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Kudos for a great SEO article - Trackback from SEOKudos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Google Building the Social Web?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Kudos for a great SEO article &#8211; Trackback from SEOKudos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
